View Poll Results: What do you think about ArenaNet charging us $10 for extra storage panes?
|
I am definitely not going buy this because they are charging us.
|
|
291 |
21.57% |
I think $10 is too much. They should lower the price.
|
|
353 |
26.17% |
10$ is a fair price to me. I will buy them if I need them.
|
|
275 |
20.39% |
I'll pay $5 or $10, don't care which.
|
|
77 |
5.71% |
I could care less. I am not buying it.
|
|
353 |
26.17% |
Apr 12, 2009, 06:18 PM // 18:18
|
#121
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: May 2006
Profession: R/
|
Big frickin babies, I swear...
/notsigned
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:24 PM // 18:24
|
#122
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Above you.
Profession: Mo/W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CronkTheImpaler
Bottom line. dont buy it. seems simple enough. do you boycott every company that doesnt do as you wish.
|
Well, technically yeah... If you're not buying or using their products you're boycotting them.
Except, 1 random person here and there isn't exactly enough reason for a company to care.
Then again, "as you wish" could mean a lot of things... Like, things you'd maybe kinda like, or things you'd strongly disagree with, or things that you think are just appalling and the people responsible should be dragged out onto the street then tar-and-feathered for it and perhaps pitchcapped after for good measure...
I'd say probably so to the latter of those... The first, not so much.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:27 PM // 18:27
|
#123
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Budapest
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karate Jesus
I don't think people are so upset about the fact that they're charging. I think people are upset that it's 9.99 USD, which is the same price of a character slot or a Guild Wars Platinum (at Gamestop or Walmart) and that's just stupid marketing.
Why would we want to pay for 20 slots when we can get 40 or more for the same price?
|
if you dont want then dont buy easy as pie...
/notsigned this BS
seriously what were you thinking?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:31 PM // 18:31
|
#124
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Guild: Servants of Fortuna
Profession: W/
|
/not signing...
(on a standard 8 toon account, no added slots)
Equipment storage will open up (hopefully) 10 slots per toon... and then the free chest for another 20 slots... thats 100 slots of space for free... which will be another whole X Chest worth of space...
The more I think about it... the more I am ok with the $10 for each extra space... if you need more then a 100 extra slots... you have serious pack rat issues...
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:32 PM // 18:32
|
#125
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Profession: A/R
|
this is understandable but what about people who dont have Visas or master cards there left out. So guildwars should allow plays to pay with ecto's maybe 10 ectos for the 10 dollars?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:32 PM // 18:32
|
#126
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keli
if you dont want then dont buy easy as pie...
/notsigned this BS
seriously what were you thinking?
|
Lol, read the post above you. Amarox is right. Not buying = boycotting. Hut-duuuuur.
Everyone please stop being stereotypical by saying either "Stop being babies!" "QQ moar" and actually give a reason why you don't like it. Que es discussion?
Last edited by Karate Jesus; Apr 12, 2009 at 06:35 PM // 18:35..
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:33 PM // 18:33
|
#127
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Guild: The German Order [GER]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burst Cancel
I love it when people talk about what price something "should" be. The reality is that you don't have a damn clue what the price should be, and you are not qualified to opine on the price in the first place.
You know what decides what the price "should" be? The market. Accurate a priori pricing is pretty much impossible, especially for you internet cumgarglers that think prices are based on handwaving bullshit like arbitrarily fabricated moral obligations and what you, personally, would pay for something.
|
* Buy account for 10$
* Buy two character slots for total of 10$
They both offer better "storage performance" (two slots are 5 times more of storage that panel, account is 12 times more storage+material storage; if we count new bag slots it is 6 times and 14 times more respectivelly)
They are different as far as convenience and other nonstorage benefits are concerned, but simplest math is simple: According to current pricing, storage tab is worth around 1.50$. If you would pay more, you are better off with slots or accounts.
Consider that people still want more storage with theese two options. Somethings tells me that "demand" does not think that 1.5$ storage tab is good deal, because otherwise it would be satisfied by buying accounts (which have also other significant benefits).
Last edited by zwei2stein; Apr 12, 2009 at 06:37 PM // 18:37..
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:37 PM // 18:37
|
#128
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: Los Chavos Del [ocho]
Profession: W/
|
No, shut up.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:41 PM // 18:41
|
#129
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ny
Guild: [KISS]
Profession: D/
|
/signed
This is a scam for peole who have alot of items, farm alot, have alot of armor they dont want to throw away on multiple characters.
If they would of made it smaller price of close to $2 per then we would all jump in and it would be great, but $10 is pushing it. This isnt like the bonus pack or skill packs which are useful for situations.
People who dont sign for this are complete shlobs who would typicaly go for anything looking great on the surface
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:44 PM // 18:44
|
#130
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: You should know
Profession: W/
|
how can you boycott something that's being automatically put into the game...
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:44 PM // 18:44
|
#131
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2007
Profession: N/
|
Anet didnt make you get all the items you tool.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:45 PM // 18:45
|
#132
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: D/
|
/sign
How long did we wait for them to complete this "super storage update"? Not once did we see any mention that we would be charged for additional storage in the update. They're only mentioning it now not even a month before they're updating, and trying to make it up to us by giving us some Daily Quests and a lvl5 pet station (which also includes more money-milking opportunities for them). So I guess these amazing twice a year updates are going to be small patches of not-so-green grass with a price-tag.
Do not enable Anet to do this by saying "well it's anet they need the money and I will follow them into volcanos and insult anyone who says otherwise". NCSoft is a corporation and it's their job to herd their followers and convince them that they need money. Look at ANY and EVERY corporation. There is at least one person there that knows how to bait people and rake in cash. The point is to make large profits not exist on the fringe of going into the red. If they really needed money we might be seeing even small allusions to it, such as "Please donate to support our servers" or whatever nonsense.
Don't even say "Well maybe the price could be lower". Why is there even a price on storage space in a game this big? How long has storage been an obvious issue? How long has Anet been saying "We're looking at ways to improve your storage"? And now at the zero hour when there's no time left they're charging you for something you need in order to further their wants (and there's no time left to boycott, because if this were up for discussion the initial plans however many months ago would have been "we're looking at adding Pay2Store options" in order to gauge public approval).
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:45 PM // 18:45
|
#133
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmerfez
how can you boycott something that's being automatically put into the game...
|
Not paying for it. Do you people know what boycott means?
Look, here's how it works. If enough people don't buy it, then the company will get the hint that we don't want to pay $10 for storage and they'll lower the price.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:50 PM // 18:50
|
#134
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: May 2007
Guild: Scions of Carver [SCAR]
Profession: E/
|
/notsigned because we're getting free tabs either way. More slots are ftw, but I'm not paying 10 bucks for another tab. I'm sure the what, roughly ~100-200 extra slots should be more than satisfactory. If A-net realizes that not many people besides a select group of pack rats are paying for tabs, then they'll either lower the price or eliminate it altogether. But right now, these extra tabs are more than enough for moi.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:51 PM // 18:51
|
#135
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Guild: Looking for good PvE guild ...
Profession: A/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by king swift
/Signed. I feel like this is an update to gain money rather than an update to help the players. I am boycotting the buying of the extra storage.
-IGN: King Swift
|
Lol... signing your own thing with a different post. This is a stupid idea, no one is forcing you to buy the storage on a game that doesn't have a monthly fee. If you don't want to pay it then don't buy it, it's not that difficult.
/notsigned
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:51 PM // 18:51
|
#136
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Budapest
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karate Jesus
Lol, read the post above you. Amarox is right. Not buying = boycotting. Hut-duuuuur.
Everyone please stop being stereotypical by saying either "Stop being babies!" "QQ moar" and actually give a reason why you don't like it. Que es discussion?
|
boycott = you agree that you wont buy the thingy which you WANT to buy anyway (economic boycott)
so you ask everybody who wants to buy to dont buy it
i wont buy it because i dont need it, but i wrote down my opinion about this and in my opinion this is a big BS...
so i encourage everybody to buy it if he wants, and if somebody doesnt want to buy it then dont
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:55 PM // 18:55
|
#137
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: El Centro CA
Guild: Lazy Imperius Legionis (LaZy)
Profession: W/P
|
/Unsigned Let ANET charge for extra storage spaces IT IS A FREE GAME! If ANET really wanted money they would of charged a monthy fee and NOT made the storage upgrades. Think about it, make storage upgrades for $10 or don't make them and let people just buy extra accounts or extra chars which cost more.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 06:56 PM // 18:56
|
#138
|
Never Too Old
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rhode Island where there are no GW contests
Guild: Order of First
Profession: W/R
|
I'm sure this has been mentioned somewhere in this thread, but a lot of people wont' buy the extra storage. ArenaNet has always made "pay-for" extras optional so you buy what you desire or can afford.
Making it sound like they are trying to force you into an expensive add-on is ridiculous.
A new equipment bag for each character will supply most players with sufficient extra storage and cost only in-game gold. While I do not consider $10 excessive for another storage pane, I don't think I will need one.
Only big-time traders would really need all the extra storage being made available, and they will look at it as the cost of doing business (although most of them already have multiple accounts for storage).
__________________
That's me, the old stick-in-the-mud non-fun moderator. (and non-understanding, also)
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 07:00 PM // 19:00
|
#139
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darcy
I'm sure this has been mentioned somewhere in this thread, but a lot of people wont' buy the extra storage. ArenaNet has always made "pay-for" extras optional so you buy what you desire or can afford.
Making it sound like they are trying to force you into an expensive add-on is ridiculous.
A new equipment bag for each character will supply most players with sufficient extra storage and cost only in-game gold. While I do not consider $10 excessive for another storage pane, I don't think I will need one.
Only big-time traders would really need all the extra storage being made available, and they will look at it as the cost of doing business (although most of them already have multiple accounts for storage).
|
You're right. Only big-time traders will need the extra storage, and that's why I'm against this. If they were smart, they'd lower the price to 4.99 USD and more people will buy them and they will probably make a better profit. Tbh, if they lower the price, I'd probably buy one and so would a lot more people.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2009, 07:05 PM // 19:05
|
#140
|
So Serious...
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Guild: Nerfs Are [WHAK]
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinta_himura
The point is to make large profits not exist on the fringe of going into the red. If they really needed money we might be seeing even small allusions to it, such as "Please donate to support our servers" or whatever nonsense.
|
Anet is not Activision Blizzard. Even if we don't know the full offer yet, it's a stretch of the mind to call this a "rip off". A rough reminder of when Anet asked us to pay for something:
2005: Prophecies (may)
2006: Factions (may), character slots, PvP unlock pack, Nightfall (november)
2007: EoTN (September), BMP (december)
2008: various upgrades/unlock packs and game packages
2009: even more storage
It's nowhere near a monthly fee or a "donation"...
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
furikuriallday |
The Riverside Inn |
37 |
Jul 30, 2006 10:20 AM // 10:20 |
DragonEye |
The Riverside Inn |
14 |
Feb 27, 2006 01:23 PM // 13:23 |
Boycott XBox360
|
Sir Skullcrasher |
Off-Topic & the Absurd |
487 |
Jan 12, 2006 05:48 AM // 05:48 |
Yellow_lid |
The Riverside Inn |
14 |
Aug 11, 2005 09:36 PM // 21:36 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 PM // 13:09.
|